söndag 25 maj 2014

Ukraine and the Shame of Europe


May 21, 2014

From the left to the right, Kiev's putative friends found reasons to think that Putin isn't such a bad fellow.

There are flickers of hope that calm can descend again on Eastern Europe. We are told that those threatening Russian military forces on the Ukraine border will be pulled back, amid hints that Moscow might be able to do business with the oligarch seemingly set to become Ukraine's next president. We must hope that this is the case, that the conflict and violence has ended. It is not too early to reflect on the performance of Kiev's putative European allies in this disturbing episode, or to reach the conclusion that their response has been shameful.
Consider the facts. A large, fledgling democracy in the Continent's biggest country struggled to take flight after years of stagnation under an obscene kleptocracy, only to be ruthlessly dismembered by its belligerent and even bigger neighbor. First came the invasion of Crimea, taken with scarcely a whimper from the West despite being the first such annexation in postwar European history, then the cruel carving up of the country's wealthy industrial heartlands.

Clearly these events were choreographed by Moscow, driven by an authoritarian regime fearful of an upsurge of freedom and consequent loss of influence over the lands ringing Russia. For those of us reporting on the brutal slaughter of protesters in Kiev in February, then the brazen theft of Crimea weeks later, and finally similar stunts in a "spontaneous" uprising in the Donbas region, the evidence points in one direction. Only the most myopic could fail to see this.

But it is depressing how many people in Europe fell for the parodic propaganda pumped out by Russian President Vladimir Putin, thereby weakening attempts to marshal a unified response. Disunity ensured that even the wan sanctions imposed by Washington seem strong by comparison, while highlighting divisions that undermine any dreams of European unity. The clash over Ukraine is often viewed as an old-fashion struggle between global powers, yet at its core lies the determination of most Ukrainians to share in their Continent's noblest ideals.

Unfortunately Mr. Putin has plenty of useful idiots on both left and right who view the tragic events in Ukraine through the prism of their own prejudices. On the right, these include ascendant populist politicians whose dislike of the European Union is so intense that they endorse an imperial aggressor rather than individuals seeking liberty and modernity. On the left are those whose visceral contempt for the United States is so hard-wired that they side with any of Uncle Sam's opponents—even if that means indulging a homophobic despot who has crushed dissent at home and sent his forces to stifle democracy abroad.

The most recent example of such reactionary anti-Americanism came last week from the celebrated British-based journalist John Pilger, who made his name covering Vietnam. He blamed the breakup of Ukraine on Washington's warmongers who "masterminded the coup in February" and were orchestrating attacks on ethnic Russians. "For the first time since the Reagan years, the U.S. is threatening to take the world to war," he told Guardian readers. Similar paranoid accusations have been made by the leader of the Stop the War Coalition, Britain's most prominent peace group.

Such deluded analysis is far from unique on the European left. In Germany, a left-wing daily newspaper has run headlines that could have been written by Russian propagandists about fascists controlling Ukraine. One German ex-cabinet minister said Kiev "had to be taught" that it could not join NATO immediately, while former Social Democrat chancellors have publicly hugged Mr. Putin, defended the annexation of Crimea, and blamed the West for causing the crisis.

It is strange to see those who had been incensed by the American invasion of Iraq defending this devastating intervention in another nation. The most charitable explanation is that they have fallen for propaganda about rampaging fascists taking over Ukraine. They turn a blind eye to the rather more uncomfortable reality that ultranationalists have captured the Kremlin. Renewed reverence for Russia on the left is one more curious Cold War echo with this conflict.

Yet it is reflected on the right too. Perhaps this makes more sense: The populist parties riding the anti-politics wave sweeping Europe can identify with Mr. Putin's patriotism, his cultural conservatism, his economic interventionism, his antipathy to globalization, his muscular alliance with the religious establishment. But the populists' support is really rooted in loathing of the European Union. This makes them oblivious to pain caused in Ukraine, let alone the dangers of a complex crisis spiraling out of control. "We have been told the EU stands for peace," Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders told the Dutch Parliament. "Now . . . we know better: the EU stands for warmongering."

Far-right fringe parties are expected to do well in elections this month for the European Parliament, which can only weaken resolve to impose tough new restrictions on Russia. In France, the National Front is leading in opinion polls; its leader, Marine Le Pen, has been courted by the Kremlin while her foreign-affairs chief defended the discredited Crimea referendum and echoed Moscow's language about an "illegitimate" government in Kiev. Little wonder an unpopular Socialist government in France recently opted to carry on with the sale of two aircraft carriers to Russia, ignoring U.S. pleas to pull the deal.

In Britain, the U.K. Independence Party is also predicted to win the forthcoming European parliamentary ballot. Ukip leader Nigel Farage alleged that the EU had "blood on its hands" after meddling in Ukraine and professed his admiration for Mr. Putin's political skills. But even some prominent members of the ruling Conservative Party seem to prefer the former KGB apparatchik to those hated bureaucrats in Brussels—former party chairman Lord Tebbit recently expressed sympathy for Russia, having seen the bullying EU "annex" chunks of central Europe.

Such are the delusions on both left and right. Ukraine's travails were sparked by the desire for democracy and self-determination, powerful forces that populists of all persuasions elsewhere in Europe take for granted. Now we can only watch nervously as this wounded country plans an election for May 25, seeking a path to freedom and prosperity while, in the distance, Vladimir Putin seethes and Europe shrugs.

Ian Birrel

Meeting the Donbass Battalion: Russian Roulette in Ukraine

lördag 17 maj 2014

Twitter kan spärras i Ryssland


Publicerad 16.05.2014 - 17:36. Uppdaterad 16.05.2014 - 18:30

Mikrobloggen Twitter kan spärras i Ryssland, uppger det ryska medieövervakningsverket.

Orsaken sägs vara att Twitter vid upprepade tillfällen inte har avlägsnat så kallat extremistiskt material då ryska myndigheter har begärt det.

Medieövervakningsverkets informatör uppger för Radio Echo Moskvy att Twitters "icke-konstruktiva" attityd kan göra det ofrånkomligt att spärra tillgången till tjänsten.

Verkets biträdande direktör Maksim Ksenzov säger till tidningen Izvestija att Twitter också har reagerat långsamt på ärekränkningsfall och falska konton.

En ny lag som träder i kraft på hösten skulle också tvinga populära bloggare att registrera sig hos myndigheterna.

New Chippenham mayor held in Russia as suspected terrorist


16 May 2014

The new mayor of Chippenham got the fright of his life last week when Russian police arrested him as a suspected terrorist.

Councillor John Scragg has just got back from Russia, where he said he was detained for five hours.

He was on an organised trip in Samara, southwest Russia, with about 20 others to see the local public transport, when he and another man got taken into the metro police station.

“The police couldn’t work out why all our photos were of trams and trolley buses, rather than the usual cathedrals,” said Coun Scragg, 68.

“I feared we were going to get thrown out of Russia. They questioned us separately and finally let us go at 11.30pm.”

Chippenham’s chains were passed from Sylvia Gibson to Coun Scragg on Tuesday night. It is the third time the Liberal Democrat councillor, who represents the Lowden and Rowden ward, has been elected mayor, also having served in the role in 1992 and 2005.

Coun Scragg, of Field View, Chippenham, said: “It’s great because you get to meet a lot of people and get a really good idea of what’s going on in the town.”

His charity of the year will be research into cures for eye disease.

Coun David Powell is deputy mayor.

Julie Armstrong

Mayor, 69, of sleepy market town arrested as he photographed trams and trolleybuses during Russian holiday - because police thought he was a TERRORIST


15 May 2014

John Scraggs, mayor of Chippenham, was collared by Russian authorities
He was taking pictures of trams and trolley buses in the city of Samara
But agents suspected he was a terrorist looking for targets
The 69-year-old was interrogated for five hours before he was released

An elderly mayor from a quiet market town in Wiltshire was arrested on a trip to Russia because they suspected he was a terrorist - after he took pictures of trams and trolley buses.

John Scraggs, the 69-year-old first citizen of Chippenham, was led to the cells and interrogated after they found photos of him standing next to the vehicles.

Despite his protests, Mr Scraggs and another man from a 20-strong party of tourists were held for five hours and faced tough questioning from interrogators.

The white-faced pair feared they’d be deported from Russia or even worse, sent to do hard labour in Siberia.

But the authorities finally accepted they were innocent trippers on an organised visit to Samara in south-east Russia and let them go.

The public transport enthusiast couldn’t wait to make the trip to Russia with fellow enthusiasts to see the buses and trains.

'They couldn’t work out why all our photos were of trams and trolley buses rather than the usual cathedrals,' said the mayor today.

'They must have thought we were terrorists and we’d taken photos of each other standing next to likely targets like the transport system.

'I feared we were going to get thrown out of Russia, or worse.

Sam Webb

France’s agony over warships for Putin: Sale of vessels to Russia would symbolise west’s weakness


15 May 2014

Since the crisis over Ukraine first erupted, EU member states have wavered over how much economic pain they are prepared to inflict on themselves to contain Russian aggression.

The concerns are various. Britain fears that the imposition of financial and banking sanctions would lead to a rush of Russian capital out of the City of London. Germany and Italy worry that an energy embargo would prompt Russia to stop the supply of oil and gas on which they rely. The most immediate dilemma, however, is faced by France, which is in the final stages of selling two warships to Russia for €1.2bn.

In 2008 Nicolas Sarkozy, then French president, agreed to sell Russia two Mistral class vessels, which can carry troops, landing craft and helicopters. Mr Sarkozy’s decision was contentious from the start. That same year President Vladimir Putin had angered the west by occupying Georgia. The US immediately warned France that the sale would give Mr Putin greater opportunity to enforce his will in Russia’s near abroad.

Mr Putin’s annexation of Crimea and provocation in eastern Ukraine this week led John Kerry, US secretary of state, to express that concern more forcefully. But President François Hollande’s government is pressing ahead. It will take a final decision on whether to complete the sale in October just before the first of the ships is due to set sail for Russia. About 400 Russian sailors will arrive in France in two weeks for training aboard that vessel.

France makes numerous arguments to justify the sale. It says that it is merely selling the Kremlin unarmed “civilian hulls”, which Russia will have to fit out with its own weapons systems. Alternative buyers are likely to be scarce because Moscow has already installed some Russian-made components on the vessels.

France can also argue that all western nations – even the US – are seeking to impose sanctions on Russia that are neither retrospective nor undermine domestic interests. The US, for example, is proposing a new set of energy sanctions that block the export of oil and gas technology to Russia for future drilling projects but not existing ones. By doing this, the US hopes to inflict pain without undermining Russia’s immediate contribution to energy supplies.

The problem for France is that, in the wake of what we have already seen from Mr Putin, the sale of this hardware would send a powerful signal of western weakness. Russia would be able to use these warships to threaten its most vulnerable neighbours – the Black Sea states of Ukraine and Georgia and the Baltic states within Nato. The US would understandably see this as yet further proof that Europe is more interested in weapons sales than maintaining its part of the transatlantic security bargain within Nato.

France’s allies should assist in trying to find another destination for these ships. This will not be easy. It would be costly for France to incorporate the vessels into its own constrained defence budget. EU and Nato member states might perhaps consider sharing the costs of purchasing and running them as a common asset. In any event, France should not end up in a situation where it is taking a unilateral hit for punishing Russia.

This is not an easy matter for Mr Hollande. Whatever his faults may have been on domestic policy, he has been decisive on defence and security matters. Last year he courageously sent French troops to confront jihadism in Mali and chaos in the Central African Republic.

He now needs to show the same resolve on the warship sale. If it goes ahead this autumn, it will stand as an indelible symbol of French – and European – weakness in the face of Mr Putin’s aggression.

Deutsche Topmanager pilgern zu Putins Wirtschaftsgipfel


12. Mai 2014

Die Ukraine-Krise eskaliert, dennoch reisen deutsche Topmanager nach Rußland. E.on, Metro, BASF, Daimler - sie alle werden beim St. Petersburger Wirtschaftsforum vertreten sein. Und wohl dem Patron der Konferenz applaudieren: Wladimir Putin.

Einmal im Jahr läßt sich Wladimir Putin öffentlich Beifall von den ganz Großen der Welt zollen. In Sankt Petersburg, seiner Heimatstadt. Die Bühne dafür hat sich Rußlands starker Mann selbst geschaffen: das Sankt Petersburger Internationale Wirtschaftsforum vom 22. bis 24. Mai 2014. Aus einer bescheidenen regionalen Konferenz hat Putin ein Stelldichein der globalen Entscheider aus Industrie und Politik gemacht. Die "russische Antwort" auf das Davoser Weltwirtschaftsforum, wie es der Kreml gerne tituliert.

2013 kam sogar Angela Merkel nach St. Petersburg. Doch zur 18. Auflage in der kommenden Woche werden wohl keine westlichen Spitzenpolitiker anreisen: Die Ukraine-Krise, die immer mehr zum Bürgerkrieg eskaliert, läßt einen Auftritt diplomatisch nicht angeraten erscheinen. Reihenweise haben auch internationale Topmanager in den vergangenen Tagen den hochpolitischen Termin abgesagt. Aber einige hartgesottene deutsche Wirtschaftsgrößen wollen Putin dennoch ihre Aufwartung machen.

E.on-Chef Johannes Teyssen, Metro-CEO Olaf Koch oder der Öl- und Gasvorstand von BASF, Harald Schwager - sie alle kommen nach St. Petersburg, wie SPIEGEL ONLINE auf Anfrage von den Unternehmen erfuhr. Auf der Liste der Teilnehmer stehen auch Hubertus von Grünberg, der deutsche Verwaltungsratschef des Schweizer Elektronik-Konzerns ABB, Hans-Paul Bürkner, der deutsche Chairman der Boston Consulting Group, der ehemalige Post-Chef Klaus Zumwinkel sowie Mario Mehren, Russland-Vorstand des Gasversorgers Wintershall, und Klaus Mangold, Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender bei TUI und ehemaliger Vorsitzender des Ost-Ausschusses der Deutschen Wirtschaft.

Das Weiße Haus rät von der Teilnahme ab

Die US-Regierung sieht das anders. Es wäre "eine unangemessene Botschaft, wenn die wichtigsten Geschäftsleute nach Russland reisen, um bei solchen Ereignissen hochkarätige Auftritte mit russischen Regierungsvertretern zu haben", sagte eine Sprecherin des Weißen Hauses. Die CEOs von Goldman Sachs, PepsiCo, Morgan Stanley, ConocoPhillips und auch Klaus Kleinfeld, der deutsche Chef von Alcoa - sie alle haben zurückgezogen. Laut eines Berichts der "New York Times" hat Präsident Obama seine engsten Wirtschaftsberater ausgeschickt, um die Unternehmenslenker hinter den Kulissen zu bearbeiten und von einem Besuch in Rußland abzuhalten.

Die Bundesregierung gibt sich indes bedeckt. "Wir geben keine Empfehlungen ab zum St. Petersburger Forum", sagte eine Sprecherin des Wirtschaftsministeriums auf Anfrage von Spiegel Online.

"Business as usual geht gar nicht"

Zuletzt waren SPD-Altkanzler Gerhard Schröder und der außenpolitische Sprecher der CDU Philipp Mißfelder ins Kreuzfeuer geraten, als sie zu einem Geburtstagsempfang für Schröder mit Putin nach Rußland reisten. Zuvor hatte bereits Siemens-Vorstandschef Joe Kaeser Ende März mit einem Besuch bei Putin für Wirbel gesorgt. Kaeser hat Sankt Petersburg gerade abgesagt - wie auch Deutsche-Bank-Chef Jürgen Fitschen, offiziell wegen anderer Verpflichtungen. Allerdings steht Siemens-Industrievorstand Siegfried Russwurm nach wie vor auf der Teilnehmerliste. Eine Entscheidung über seine Anreise werde in den nächsten Tagen getroffen, sagte ein Firmensprecher.

"Business as usual geht für die Konferenzteilnehmer gar nicht", sagt Franziska Brantner, Außenexpertin der Grünen im Bundestag, zu SPIEGEL ONLINE. "Wenn sie dahinreisen, müssen sie das Podium nutzen: ein Zeichen setzen und öffentliche Kritik an Putins Politik üben." Schließlich nehmen die deutschen Manager in St. Petersburg an einer Reihe von Diskussionsrunden teil. Brantner: "Die Vertreter der Energieindustrie sollen darlegen, wie sie die Ankündigung der Kanzlerin umsetzen wollen, von russischen Gasimporten unabhängiger zu werden."

So weit wird es kaum kommen. Reisen doch gerade diejenige Topmanager nach St. Petersburg, deren Konzerne in Rußland besonders viel Geld verdienen. "Unser CEO nimmt teil, weil wir ein großes Rußland-Geschäft haben", sagt ein E.on-Sprecher frei heraus. E.on importiert nicht nur jährlich Erdgas für mehrere Milliarden Euro - sondern ist auch größter ausländische Stromversorger in Rußland. Für Metro ist das Land der zweitgrößte Absatzmarkt und laut CEO Koch die "Ertragsperle" des Konzerns. Bis zum Ausbruch der Ukraine-Krise plante der deutsche Handelsriese sogar den Börsengang des Rußland-Geschäfts. Die BASF-Tochter Wintershall hat mit Gazprom ein Partnerschaftsabkommen geschlossen und beutet gemeinsam mit dem russischen Gasmonopolisten Felder in Sibirien aus. Und Daimler montiert gemeinsam mit dem russischen Partner Kamaz vor Ort Lastwagen der Marken Mercedes-Benz und Fuso. Sie alle haben großes Interesse, sich Putins Gunst zu erhalten.

Der Kreml-Chef kommt natürlich auch zu seinem Lieblingsevent. Laut einer Sprecherin des Forums wird er dort am Freitag seine große Rede halten. Danach werden ihm die deutschen Topmanager wohl kräftig applaudieren müssen.

Claus Hecking

onsdag 7 maj 2014

Pressfrihet saknas i Ryssland


7 maj 2014

Den ryska pressen är inte fri. Det konstaterar den amerikanska tankesmedjan Freedom House i sin rapport för 2013.

Freedom House har rankat 197 länder och områden efter hur fri press de har. Förra året bedömdes 63 undersökta länder och områden ha pressfrihet. På 68 platser ansågs pressen vara ”delvis fri”, medan den bedömdes vara ”ofri” i 66 länder och områden. Ryssland hamnade på samma plats som 2012, 176, och tillhör därmed de länder som saknar pressfrihet.

Enligt rapporten behåller den ryska regeringen ett fast grepp om de nationella medierna samtidigt som myndigheterna i större utsträckning även försöker styra vilka åsikter som publiceras på bloggar och i utländska medier.

- Flertalet etermedier och privata tryckta medier kontrolleras av staten. Internet är en av få platser i Ryssland där det finns yttrandefrihet. Men förra året utökades kontrollen även över vad som publiceras på nätet, säger Karin Karlekar, projektledare för rapporten, till Radio Liberty.

Trots att pressfriheten är grundlagsskyddad i Ryssland är förståelsen för att en av mediernas roll är att kontrollera statsmakten mycket begränsad. Ryska politiker och tjänstemän utnyttjar ofta de korrupta domstolarna för att trakassera oberoende journalister som vågar ifrågasätta myndigheternas agerande, enligt rapporten. Under året stängdes nyhetsbyrån RIA Novosti och ett antal journalister, bloggare och visselblåsare åtalades för extremism och andra påhittade brott. Det finns också flera exempel på utländska journalister som vägrades journalistvisum under 2013. De förhindrades därmed att bevaka känsliga ämnen – till exempel kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter i samband med förberedelserna inför de olympiska spelen i Sotji.

Putin ger journalister medalj för ”objektivitet”


6 maj 2014

I skuggan av den dramatiska utvecklingen i Ukraina inskränks pressfriheten i Ryssland i allt högre grad. I det odeklarerade krig som pågår i östra och södra Ukraina är propagandan ett viktigt vapen, där president Vladimir Putin belönat flera hundra journalister för ”objektiv rapportering”.

Den ryska sidan har hittills visat sig vara överlägsen den ukrainska på propagandafronten. Ett skäl är att det i Ukraina, till skillnad från Ryssland, råder en viss grad av pluralism. De ukrainska medborgarna har olika källor att tillgå för att bilda sig en uppfattning om vad som pågår.

I dagens nätbaserade värld är det svårt även för en i allt högre grad auktoritär regim som den ryska att kontrollera all information. Men det hindrar inte att Kreml har gett order om att en rad internetpublikationer ska blockeras.

På måndagen blev det känt att Putin nyligen dekorerade över 300 ryska journalister och mediepersoner med statliga ordnar och förtjänstmedaljer. Motiveringen för utmärkelserna var ”hög professionalism och objektivitet” i samband med rapporteringen av händelserna på Krim och i Ukraina.

En stor del av hedersbetygelserna gick till reportrar och korrespondenter vid Kremltrogna tv-bolag som Rossija, 1:a kanalen, NTV och Russia Today. Att just de här statstyrda medierna belönats är logiskt; de dominerar den ryska etern, medan de oberoende kanaler som ännu existerar blir allt mer kringskurna. Dessutom är detta mediearbetare som med den ryska statsvetaren Lilia Sjevtsovas ord ”har visat sig vara den mest framgångsrika militära försvarsgrenen, och de har prisats för sitt deltagande i kriget”.

En hög statlig orden – ”Förtjänster för fosterlandet av 4:e graden” – gavs till Alexander Zjarov, chef för en central censurmyndighet som bär den sovjetklingande förkortningen Roskomnadzor (den federala byrån för övervakning av informationsteknologi och masskommunikation). Zjarov är inte journalist, utan belönades för att han stoppat flera obekväma nyhetssajter.

Det pinsamma är att den ryske presidentens eget människorättsråd samtidigt publicerar en rapport som avslöjar hur både Kreml och dess medier blåljög om den av omvärlden icke erkända ”folkomröstningen” på Krim den 16 mars som genomfördes under rysk militär ockupation.

Enligt Moskva röstade 83 procent av de röstberättigade på Krim, och av dem påstods 95 procent ha sagt ja till anslutning till Ryska federationen. Det låter som ett massivt stöd.
Men i själva verket, heter det i en rapport från människorätts­rådet, var det endast mellan 30 och 50 procent som deltog i valet. Av dem röstade 50 till 60 procent för en anslutning.
Det innebär att 15–30 procent av de röstberättigade på Krim sade ja till Ryssland.

I en intervju med SvD säger dock en av de angivna författarna att rapporten inte existerar.
Inget av valfusket fick nämnas i de stora medierna, och två dagar senare signerade Putin och den nyinstallerade ledningen på Krim ett avtal om att halvön omedelbart skulle annekteras av Ryssland.

Michael Winiarski

Putin's Human Rights Council Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results: Only 15% Voted for Annexation


May 5, 2014

As you may recall, the official Crimean election results, as reported widely in the Western press, showed a 97 percent vote in favor of annexation with a turnout of 83 percent. No international observers were allowed. The pro-Russia election pressure would have raised the already weak vote in favor of annexation, of course.

Yesterday, however, according to a major Ukrainian news site, TSN.ua, the website of the President of Russia’s Council on Civil Society and Human Rights (shortened to President’s Human Rights Council) posted a report that was quickly taken down as if it were toxic radioactive waste. According to this purported report about the March referendum to annex Crimea, the turnout of Crimean voters was only 30 percent. And of these, only half voted for the referendum–meaning only 15 percent of Crimean citizens voted for annexation.

The TSN report does not link to a copy of the cited report. However, there is a report of the Human Rights Council, entitled “Problems of Crimean Residents,” still up on the president-sovet.ru website, which discusses the Council’s estimates of the results of the March 16 referendum. Quoting from that report: “In Crimea, according to various indicators, 50-60% voted for unification with Russia with a voter turnout (yavka) of 30-50%.” This leads to a range of between 15 percent (50% x 30%) and 30 percent (60% x 50%) voting for annexation. The turnout in the Crimean district of Sevastopol, according to the Council, was higher: 50-80%.

The original version, in Russian, and a version clumsily translated by Google, are below:


To make sure no one misses this:

Official Kremlin results: 97 percent of polled voters for annexation, turnout 83 percent, and 82 percent of total Crimean population voting in favor.

President’s Human Rights Council mid-point estimate: 55 percent of polled voters for annexation, turnout 40 percent, 22.5 percent of total Crimean population voting in favor.
A member of the Human Rights Council, Svetlana Gannushkina, talked about election fraud on Kanal 24 (as replayed on Ukrainian television), declaring that the Crimean vote “discredited Russia more than could be dreamed up by a foreign agent.”

We can debate the extent of fraud in the March 16 referendum, but only the Council’s highest estimate just yields the fifty percent turnout ratio normally required for major referendums. What counts is that the Putin regime solemnly announced to the world that 82 percent of the Crimean people voted to join Mother Russia, and many in the West swallowed this whopper. At best, according to Putin’s own council, only 30 percent did.

Putin plans to repeat the Crimean election farce in the May 11 referendum on the status of the so-called People’s Republic of Donetsk. He will use the same tricks to produce an overwhelming vote for “independence” and a high turnout. The few international election monitors will object, but Putin counts on repetition of his Big Lie to convince his own people and sympathetic politicians and press in the West that the people of east Ukraine actually want to separate from Ukraine.

Will the West let Putin get away with it again?

UPDATE: This article has been updated to include a screenshot of a report from the Russian Human Rights Council, and revised to reflect the turnout and voting ranges reflected in that report. The original version of this article only discussed the 15 percent figure cited in Ukrainian media.

Paul Roderick Gregory

Police bust Czech cell of Russian neo-Nazi organisation


5 May 2014

Prague - Police have busted a Czech cell of the Wotan Jugend neo-Nazi organisation from Russia and accused five of its members of support for and promotion of movements aimed at suppressing human rights and freedoms, Prague police spokeswoman Andrea Zoulova told ČTK today.

The accused face up to five years in prison if found guilty, Zoulova added.

Detectives, from the anti-extremism squad, were looking into the establishment of a Czech cell of the Wotan Jugend Russian neo-Nazi organisation by a 21-year-old foreigner, living permanently in the Czech Republic, and another man, who is in prison now for racially motivated violent crimes.

Prague policemen were investigating the case for a few months, Zoulova said.

According to the police, the Wotan Jugend movement was founded by members of the Moloth band in Russia in 2008. It is to provide ideological, promotional and financial support to prisoners convicted of crimes with racial, ethnic, national and other similar motives.

The movement is closely connected with the "National Socialist" black metal music style, mainly with Moloth.

Wotan Jugend gains money for its activities by the sale of clothing, stickers, CDs and other items with the movement´s motive or Moloth´s emblem and by staging concerts, sport events and public fund-raising campaigns.

Vision of United Ukraine Under Violent Attack


May 4, 2014

DONETSK, Ukraine — Diana Berg and Ekaterina Kostrova were brought up speaking Russian, but in the past few weeks they have discovered in themselves a new sense of Ukrainian patriotism. Theirs was a vision of a united Ukraine, a country with “European values” but with close ties to Russia, a country where it does not matter whether you speak Russian or Ukrainian at home — because you can express yourself freely in either language.

Little by little, that vision is under attack — by men with guns and stone-hurling, stick-wielding mobs, by street battles and molotov cocktails.

“Most of us don’t want to be a part of the European Union, but we don’t want to be part of Russia either,” Kostrova, 23, said last week in the apartment the women share in the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk. “We just want to live in a united Ukraine.”

“We insist it is possible to stay in Ukraine, be ethnic Russian and speak the Russian language,” Berg said.

Kostrova describes herself as a writer. The 34-year-old Berg is a graphic designer. Both speak English fluently. Neither had any inclination to get involved in politics, at least not until gunmen took over their city and proclaimed it the capital of the new pro-Russian, independent Donetsk People’s Republic. There is talk of a “silent majority” in Donetsk opposed to the division of Ukraine, but Kostrova and Berg decided they could not remain silent.

“We could not go on, just passively observing,” Berg said. “We saw this catastrophe going on around us, and we wanted to do something. That’s why we gathered the first rally.”

“We asked ourselves, ‘What the hell is going on?’ ” Kostrova added. “We felt a mixture of rage and anger and despair. We couldn’t understand why nobody was doing anything. So we decided to do something.”

What they did was set up a page on a popular social-media site here and invite people to join in a “grass-roots” rally for a united Ukraine. They expected a few hundred to attend. On March 4, they say, 2,000 people came. The following day, it was 10,000. They describe their supporters as “mostly educated, free-minded, critically thinking people.”

But their attempts at peaceful protest were met with hatred and abuse. Kostrova says her brother and cousins support the separatists and have posted insulting comments on social media about her. Berg said she has received death threats.

On April 28, they marched through the streets of Donetsk, joined by men, women and children, with flowers in their hair and Ukrainian flags flying high. They walked into a trap, attacked by hundreds of men who were wielding clubs and whips and carrying gasoline bombs, commonly known as molotov cocktails. Riot police stood by and watched. Some, Berg said, even joined in beating the marchers.

“We were beaten at our march just for having Ukrainian flags,” Kostrova said. “The pro-Russians who attacked us said we are fascists, but they burnt our flags and beat our people — so who are the fascists?”

The women fled into nearby buildings but decided that the city was no longer safe. On Wednesday, they decided to leave for the Black Sea port city of Odessa. “I got sick of being afraid for the safety of my own life,” Berg said. “Nobody is coming here to help us.”

The pair say they feel abandoned by the new government in Kiev, as well as the “Euromaidan” protesters who toppled the pro-Moscow government of Viktor Yanukovych in February. “People from this region went to Kiev for Euromaidan, but now nobody there cares about what is going on here,” Berg said.

But her story took an ugly turn when she joined a pro-Ukrainian rally in Odessa on Friday, attended by thousands of soccer fans before a game that night, as well as ordinary citizens.

The peaceful march came under attack by hundreds of men armed with sticks and shields, some carrying guns and molotov cocktails.

But the soccer fans, the most organized and fanatical of whom are known as the “ultras,” were no pushover. A group of them, carrying shields and sticks and wearing helmets, had assembled to defend the marchers.

For hours, the streets of Odessa were the scene of running battles between stone-throwing mobs from both sides. Photographs show masked men using the cover of police barricades to shoot at the pro-Ukrainian side; three people were fatally shot.

Eventually, the pro-Russian forces were overwhelmed and fled.

That evening, pro-Ukrainian forces counterattacked, burning tents where some of the separatists had been camped and attacking a building where they had taken shelter.

Berg watched the attack unfold. She says the pro-Ukrainian supporters were fired on from the roof of a building but admits that some of them threw gasoline bombs at the structure. Flames enveloped the building. About 40 people died, choked by smoke or after jumping from windows in desperation.

Earlier in the day, Berg had been triumphant. “Odessa is ours,” she had said. But later, as she realized the scale of the tragedy she had witnessed, she was appalled.

“It is awful, it is terrifying. I can’t imagine how their families feel,” she said. This, she said, was not her vision of a peaceful, united Ukraine.

“But I see how violence causes violence,” she said. “It was a peaceful event, just Odessa citizens, and they were attacked. They just shot them with guns. It made people angry, and they decided to fight back.”

Berg says she and her family are receiving hundreds of death threats a day, with her address and photographs posted on Russian social-media sites alongside abusive comments. She wonders whether she will ever be able to return to her home town.

Simon Denyer